Moon Comment – The Benefits of Brexit

Blue_Moon2

MOON COMMENT – THE BENEFITS OF BREXIT

Those who are pro leaving the EU on Twitter will often get the question thrown in ‘Give me one benefit of Brexit.’ This of course is a trolling ambush attempt, by giving one it allows the questioner to come back with something along the lines ‘of ‘Is that it, is that all you have got?’ Which of course is nonsense because they only asked for one. Also the benefits to one person will not be considered such by others, it is subjective and the intention of the questioner is to rubbish your response on their own terms. On Twitter the best way to deal with such a question is to ignore it in my view.

However the benefit of a blog rather than 280 characters on Twitter challenged by a rabid pro EU Supporter is you can answer the question in your own terms. So what are the benefits of Brexit? To answer this I am go to start from an assumption that is not likely to happen in practice. I am going to assume the post Brexit arrangement is acceptance of an EFTA deal which includes, yes that’s right, includes accepting free movement. In doing so I reduce my own scope to answer the question, as I take away my right to include something very obvious.

Many would argue if we accept free movement then we are still in the EU in all but name and surely then there are no benefits. But most polls show the number one reason for voting leave was sovereignty and the freedom the nation has to make it’s own laws to go with it. As a result there are still many benefits. An EFTA deal would mean we have to accept Single Market Rules, but this only account for roughly 20% of EU law. 

1) 80% of EU law is returned to be determined by the UK.

Within that there are several policy areas that Britain will now be back in full control of

2) We leave the CAP. Decisions on subsides or how that money is distributed, or indeed not, will be in full control of the UK. This could include eliminating subsidies for rich land owners to do little. (Michael Hesletine is in my head, not sure why)

3) We will leave the Common Fisheries policy and fishing rules will be back under the control of the UK. This policy is considered so bad by Norway and Iceland both refuse to join the EU on the basis of this alone. It was also the main cause of Greenland asking to leave the EU

4) We will no longer be part of the European Home Affairs policy, in it’s early stages but something the EU wanted to take control of and would, had we remained in the EU, watered down the Home Offices control over UK internal security. This will now be back in full control of the UK

5) We will no longer be part of the EU security policy and will be free to commit more resources to the five eyes intelligence service (Including the USA, Canada, New Zealand & Australia) Which is the cornerstone of our international intelligence co-operation. This may also encourage France to consider joining it, which so far they have refused to do, as the EU no longer has a member state involved in this vital organisation.

6) We will have full control of Foreign policy and no longer part of the emerging Common EU foreign policy. We will be free to continue to pursue our interests, which are not always the same as that of the EU.

7) We will leave the emerging European defence policy and free to renew our commitment to NATO as the cornerstone of our international defence commitment, the only credible guarantee of peace and security in Europe and wider western democracy.

We would no longer be part of the Customs Union or common external tariff as EFTA members are not subject to this. This leads to two further benefits

8) We will no longer be forced to impose big tariffs on imports outside the EU. This means we can back up our commitment to international aid and the work of many charities helping the poorest in the third world, including Comic Relief, by reducing or removing these tariffs and helping the poorest economies the chance to trade and grow, which can play a big role in reducing poverty too

9) We are free to sign trade deals with whomever we wish, which we are banned from doing as a member of the EU through having to accept the Common External Tariff rules.

So all of those policies will be back under UK control even if we stay in the single market and accepted free movement. You can hear Corbynites shouting ‘What about workers rights.’ Good point. Remaining in the EU would mean in time common policies on workers rights, acceptance of EU minimums. Therefore opening the door to legal challenges should a nation state go beyond those minimums. Leaving the EU ensures.

10) UK policy on maternity leave giving a minimum of 52 weeks pay cannot be reduced to the EU minimum of 14 weeks.

11) We will be able to maintain legislation giving workers 5.6 weeks holiday, and not have it reduced to four weeks which is what EU policy mandates

12) The living/minimum wage in UK law does not exist in EU law. We will be able to keep it without legal challenge to the concept.

All of these things would be open to an ECJ challenge if we remained in the EU as common policy in these areas develops, as it will. In addition integration will also continue to develop. Since the Referendum we have seen briefings on plans for further integration on defence, economic policy and Martin Schultz call for a United States of Europe by 2025. That may be ambitious, but it is where the EU is going. Thus it is inconceivable that had we stayed in the EU, two key opt outs would credibly stay in place. Leading to two more major benefits of leaving.

13) We will never be pushed into joining the Euro from outside the EU.

14) We will never have to sign the Schengen agreement outside the EU.

Some will claim these would never happen. For me they are kidding themselves. Remaining in the EU and not signing up to those key areas of the EU in the medium term is simply not credible. The only way to ensure both never happens is to leave the EU. This is also true regarding places on international bodies too. The EU has before eyed up the places of the UK and France on the UN Security council. I wish France luck in resisting this as they will be under more pressure but for the UK leaving the EU means

15) Our place as a permanent member of the UN Security council, including the power of veto, is secure for the future

All of these things happen even if we accepted the Single Market in full. But there is a myth that the EU makes all the Single Market rules. The Single Market without EU Membership means taking rules but having no say right? Well in a few cases this is true, but not that often in reality. The majority of Single Market rules are made by the WTO or a range of sector specific bodies, usually run through the UN that the WTO presides over. Right now our vote at these bodes lies with the EU Commission. We can speak as the UK but have no vote and no say. After we leave the EU however

16) We will have our own seat, vote, even at times veto, at the WTO & other international trade bodies. Meaning while now on many of these issue our vote within the EU is actually meaningless because we cannot block the measure made at WTO level anyway, we would then have a meaningful position in these negotiations.

There are also those what the Daily Mail unkindly called ‘enemies of the people.’ The judiciary. The reality is an Independent judiciary is an important part of a sovereign nation even if you don’t always like the calls they make (Which is actually the fault of politicians for creating a system ambiguous enough that the judicary can make those calls.) In leaving the EU

17) THE UK judiciary will be free to make calls based on UK law and UK law alone, not based on EU law or have to take into account ruling from the ECJ. (With the small exception in regard to citizens rights for a time limited period, as agreed in the phase 1 Agreement between Theresa May and the EU)

So as you can see, those who wanted sovereignty would get plenty of what they wanted even if we accepted what for many is the worst scenario of staying in the Single Market & free movement. If you now ditch that assumption you can add

18) Control of immigration policy return to UK control

19) We no longer have to discriminate in favour of immigration applications from the EU and against those coming from outside the EU

20) The few areas under EFTA we would have to take laws without a say, would not be the case.

Some will argue that some or all of these last three are worth trading for an EFTA deal and it is an argument not totally without merit. As I said at the start, what constitutes a benefit of Brexit is subjective. That is true between leavers with different views on the future as it is between those keen to leave and those desperate to stay.

I’m sure there are things I have missed, quietly developing EU policies. I am unaware of that we will no longer be part of and a range of opportunities that will come that are as yet unknown. Even so for those who ask for one I have given you potentially 20. Even if you prefer the first 17, you can rest assured there are plenty of benefits to leaving the EU if you believe in a free independent nation as opposed to believe in an EU single entity. And don’t forget those trying to block the process believe in the latter, as it is the inevitable consequence of their position, even though many of them, whether through naivety or knowing complicity, claim they don’t or claim it isn’t going to happen. It is, it will, and Britain is better off out of it.

____________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Moon Of Liberty Editorial -The next Brexit battles

Blue_Moon2

Reflections Of The Moon

The next Brexit battles

Last week saw an historic turn of events. Nearly 500 MP’s voted to start the process of Leaving the European Union, something until a very short time ago would have been unthinkable. Regardless of if you thought that vote should have occurred or not (and I don’t), it was unquestionably an historic moment. Does that mean it is all over? No, there could still be battles in the House of Lords to come, although the size of the Commons majority and the threat of future sanction if the unelected house tries to stand in the way of the will of the public Referendum makes that less likely.

Some key battles will come this week in the commons however. Last weeks vote was only the second reading, this week will see the committee and report stages as well as a final (for now anyway) 3rd reading vote. It could come back to the Commons at the end if the Lords ask the Commons to look at some of their amendments. These stages allow MP’s to table their own amendments to add to the bill. Many amendments on all sides have been tables, from the SNP the Lib Dems and the Labour side. Not all will be considered, that will be for the Speaker John Bercow and his team to decide. Given how Bercow has operated however, the more contentious ones will likely be chosen and debated.

Two serious possibilities will be to guarantee the rights of foreign nationals already here and a debate on the terms of the vote Parliament will get at the end of the process. As for the foreign nationals issue, it is unlikely a deal on this will not be done in the negotiation, or separately if there is no free trade deal. This would be a difficult one for the Government to weigh up, ideally this is still a negotiating card the Government would like to keep, however there is a majority in the commons to get it through if the MP’s really want to push for it. It is not inconceivable that if the Government thought they may lose, they could conceded this anyway. I support all foreign nationals right to stay here and have no problem with this getting through. Indeed, the good will it would create may create the conditions for a better deal in the end to be obtained.

The other battle over the type of vote is more complex and could prove more important.. The Government’s position is that if there is a deal, Parliament will vote for the deal or for no deal. But what if there is just no deal? For most this would be a case of tough luck, however those desperate to stay in the single market sense an opportunity here. If there is no deal surely Parliament should have the opportunity to accept an alternative to no deal.. Theresa May has said as far as she is concerned no deal is better than a bad deal. That means trade returning to WTO rules. By pushing their amendment those pro the single market hope to keep their hope alive by forcing a vote in which the alternative would either be the EEA option, or worse still for those more cynical of the motives of some of those MP’s, there is the other option of this being a back door way of staying in the EU, as Tim Farron has proposed as the alternative in his Referendum.

It is tough to say whether any amendment based on an alternative vote could get through. In theory there may be enough Tory rebels, but some Labour MP’s will be against it as well and accounting for abstentions and perhaps the DUP backing the Government, it would still be a tough ask to win the vote. If this is called by the speaker it is one the Government must fight, their position of bi lateral deal or no deal is the right one for this country and it’s negotiation and the executive must not lose control of the terms of the final vote as it could hand those who still hope Brexit won’t happen a small window of opportunity. The Government has set out the right course, this week could see attempts to blow it off course, this must not happen. Battles this week may in the long run prove more important than last weeks vote.

________________________________________________________________

 

Moon Of Liberty Newsround – 14th jan 2017

Blue_Moon2

News Digest – 14th January 2017 @ 9.20 pm

The Sun – New Zealand Prime Minister Bill English gives Britain a Brexit boost with regard to trade deal after meeting with Theresa May

Daily Mail – EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier concedes he wants a special deal with London on financial services

CapX Comment – The EU Customs Unions is a protectionist racket – Ryan Bourne

Fox News – Vatican seeking youth input ahead of Bishop’s meeting

Telegraph – Queen is saddened by the death of Lord Snowdon

Spectator Comment – Michael Gove was accidentally right about experts – Fraser Nelson

The Sun – Theresa May vows to end European Court of Justice role in Britain

The Guardian – Green MEP Jean Lambert explains why she is standing for President of the European Parliament

Fox News – Family Feud host Steve Harvey meets Donald Trump to discuss policy on inner cities

New Statesman – How many more Labour MP’s could follow Tristram Hunt’s lead and resign?

Washington Examiner – DC National Guard commander will be forced out by Inauguration Day

Associated Press – Drone Schools look to woo younger pilots

ABC News – ‘Black Swan’ exercises taking place to practice in case of a US National emergency

The Sun – The best and worse UK banks for hidden charges

BBC News – Dozens die in IS attack on Dier Al-Zour in Syria

Sky News – Investors breathe life into the Green Deal scheme axed by UK ministers

Reuters – Officials say there are big risks in Donald Trump’s feud with security agencies

Newsweek Comment – Don’t kid youselves, Donald Trump is winning – Matthew Cooper

ABC News – Three Cleveland offices face charges after investigation into shooting of Tamir Rice

Bloomberg – Donald Trump promises a report on hacking within 90 days of taking office

Washington Journal – Parent of special needs child explains the difficulties of educating her son in US public schools

________________________________________________________________

 

 

Moon Of Liberty Newsround – 13th Jan 2017

Blue_Moon2News Digest 13th Jan 2017 @ 9.30 pm

Institute of Economic Affairs video – Jeremy Corbyn’s maximum wage ‘an absolutely terrible idea’

The Moon Of Liberty/Winning At Politics – Thursday’s local by election round up

Fox News – Rosie O’Donnell calls for martial law to stop Donald Trump’s inauguration

Bloomberg – Deutsche Bank says Brexit is driving up Berlin house prices

Sky News – Nationwide eyes £2.7bn sale of property arm assets

BBC News – Exorcist writer William Peter Blatty dies aged 89

Independent – Tristram Hunt is named new V&A director amid concerns they will start charging

NBC News – US Congress moves a step closer to repealing Obamacare

Irish Times – CIA prepares for unprecedented challenges that a Donald Trump Presidency could bring

London Evening Standard – Top public schools team up with Tottenham Hotspur FC to create a new sixth form

Order Order – The Daily Politics guide to Brexit

Independent – McDonalds to hand out thousands of free meals to the homeless

BBC News – MP Tristram Hunt resigns to become V&A museum director, forcing a by election in Stoke On Trent

Daily Express – Donald Trump predicts the end of the EU as aides ask which nations will be next to leave

________________________________________________________________

Moon Of Liberty News & Politics – News Digest

Blue_Moon2

News Digest – 11th Jan 2017 @ 2.00 pm

BBC Sport – Historic Kempton Park racecourse could be closed for new housing

Spectator Comment – A maximum wage is Corbyn’s most stupid idea yet – Brendan O’Neill

CNN – Confirmation hearing for Attourney general nominee Jeff Sessions begins

BBC – Look at inequality in the UK shows it has not got wider in the last decade

The Moon Of Liberty Editorial – The Moon editor Kevin Alcock on May, Corbyn and Trump v Hollywood

Reuters – Mexican Foreign Minister says there is now way Mexico will pay for Donald Trump’s wall

Telegraph Comment– Punishing Britain over Brexit could hasten the EU’s own end – Peter Foster

London Evening Standard – Switzerland wins key ECHR ruling on Muslim girls and mixed swimming lessons

The Guardian – Meryl Streep took aim at MMA as well as Trump, UFC Owner Dana White responds

The Guardian – Boris Johnson says Moscow is up to all kinds of dirty tricks

New Statesman – Guy Verhofstadt’s attempt to form alliance between Liberals and Italy’s 5 Star movement fails, much to UKIP’s delight

Moon Of Liberty Polling – Breakdown of ICM Poll & Cardiff University Welsh poll

Breibart London – Senior US Republican Bob Corker says Britain is in the front seat for a US trade deal

Independent Comment – Labour’s rotten day – Tom Peck

BBC News – Snapchat sets up International office in London

Daily Express – Ex Australian PM Tony Abbott backs Britain over Brexit

Order Order – UK Industrial production surges

The Sun Comment – Suing Newspapers for telling the truth? no thank you – Rod Little

Political Betting Comment – On the Northern Ireland situation – Lucian Fletcher

________________________________________________________________

 

Moon Of Liberty News & Politics – News digest – 7th January 2017 part 3

Blue_Moon2

News & Politics digest – 7th January @ 9pm

Spectator Comment – Matthew Parris on the Streetlight revolution in the UK nobody is talking about

Daily Express – Two black holes found in nearby galaxies

Sky News – Snow sweeps across Europe causing deaths and travel chaos

ABC News – US Consular officer shot in Mexico

Huffington Post – Donald Trump blames Democrats for being hacked

Daily Mail – Saudi King steps in to pay for operation of cajoined twins

Mezo News – German Vice Chancellor Sigmar Gabriel says EU break up is no longer unthinkable

Telegraph Comment – Asa Bennett argues Jeremy Corbyn is too weak to lead but too strong to remove

The Guardian – RMT walk out of talks attempted at averting London tube strike

New Statesman comment – Tim Wigmore on why Britain is better than it was 20 years ago, despite current doom and gloom

________________________________________________________________

 

 

Moon Of Liberty News & Politics – News digest

Blue_Moon2

News Digest – 7th January 2017 at 3.30pm

Telegraph Comment – Tim Stanley on why a Trump Presidency may be a very good thing

Daily Express – Marine Le Pen accuses the EU of a stitch up after they announced a fraud probe into the Front National

The Times – Tory donor Andrew Cook threatens to withdraw funding if the UK leaves the Single Market

Reuters – President Obama blames Bernie Sanders supporters for undermining Obamacare

Sky News – Theresa May pledges more support for Mental Health services

Heat Street – Changes to the Changing of the Guard in London after review coming from the Berlin attacks 

NBC News – Congress passes motion condemning the UN and it’s own President for anti Israel resolution

NBC News – Donald Trump backed Jane Timken becomes new Ohio Republican Chair

CBS News – President Obama approves four Guantanamo prisoners to be released to Saudi Arabia on 20th January as he leaves office.

Daily Telegraph – Donald Trump to return bust of Winston Churchill to the Oval Office

________________________________________________________________

Moon Of Liberty Editorial – Apple, Ireland, The EU, Remainers & the difference between free movement and free movement

Blue_Moon2

Editorial

The EU are rotten to the Apple core

Will the EU ever learn? the recent decision over demanding Apple pay 13bn Euros to the Irish Government over a deal apparently done between the two suggests that after Brexit and other recent difficulties, the EU has reverted to type. Whenever the EU has a crisis it concludes despite all the evidence that the answer is more of the EU. The decision has managed to offend both sides and the Irish Government are intending to appeal. They should be applauded for doing so, it would have been easy for them to just accept the money, but they have chosen to fight for the principal of national freedom over tax affairs before their own immediate interest.

As for the EU, it reinforces every dislikable aspect of the institution. They believe they can interfere in affairs as important as tax then there are no no-go areas for the EU Commission any longer. They have showed their hatred of freedom and liberty, their contempt for democracy and national Governments, their appetite for an EU Superstate and lust for power.Their arrogance and inability to learn or change.  As for Apple, if they find EU is closed for business, I can think of one nation that most certainly is not.

Prominent Remain supporters are changing their tune

One interesting development of the last week or so is the sea change among prominent remain supporters. Now this is not true of all, you still have Tony Blair telling French radio stations we may stay in the EU and the ludicrous Monet Professor Micheal Dougan and his academia friends are still spouting about how the result of the Referendum is not valid from their University ivory towers where the real world is a distant concept. However their clearly has been a change. Prominent Conservative MP on the remain side Anna Soubry told Channel 4 News this week that she accepts there will not be a 2nd Referendum and argued strongly for Free Movement at the start of a push from those on her side of the argument to push for the EEA or Norway post Brexit model.

There are others too. Times leader writer Oliver Kamm (The Times weekday edition leader backed remain) responded in a tweet to an article in the New Statesman that Remainers needed to keep up the pressure regarding pointing out (what they see) as the costs of Brexit in order to push for the EEA option. This was re-tweeted by high profile Guardian columnist Polly Toynbee. Toynbee later promoted the ‘March For Europe’ by tweeting ‘No-One knows what Brexit means – but the 48% want to stay close.” Note the word close, a couple of weeks ago Toynbee would not have included that word, confirming that for her, the fight for her preferred EEA option has also begun. When you have a Murdoch press leader writer and the high priestess of Guardian Leftism agreeing, you know something is happening. They are no longer fighting to stay in the EU but for their post Brexit preference. This weakens the voice of those like Doughan, to whom the likes of Kamm and Toynbee may see as an irritation to what is now the real debate. Whether you agree with the EEA option or not, the fact these Remainers who spent weeks virtually mourning the result are now joining the post Brexit debate is something we all should welcome.

The Freedom of Movement misconception

One aspect of the upcoming debate on migration as the Brexit negotiations begin is the difference between freedom of movement for workers and unrestricted freedom of movement. It has ben argued by people who were on both sides of the debate, particularly those arguing for the EEA Option, rightly in my view, that freedom of movement for workers has befitted the UK. It would be a policy I would favour us implementing, that if someone coming to the UK will be worker and has a job lined up, they should be allowed to come to the UK freely. This frankly could apply not just to the EU countries, but the World. However that is not the EU position.

The EU requires freedom of movement full stop. I living in Nottingham, could move to Ljubljana, or Bratislava and nobody could stop me regardless of my status while we remain in the EU. That of course is nonsense, and the ability to flit across boarders unrestricted undoubtedly increases the risk of terrorism with it. The reason for this EU policy is because it is a part of the creation of Europe being treated as a country and was always intended to soften us up for further integration. In order to look for the best outcome for Britain, it will be important freedom of movement for workers, for which a strong case can be made and unrestricted freedom of movement as set by the EU, for which the argument even for me Libertarian like me, who in theory would love to support total free movement, falls flat on many practical grounds, are not confused. I fear they will be all too often, potentially weakening the argument for a better immigration policy and will be used by those with various agenda to skew and cheapen the debate one way or another.

Moon Of Liberty Editorial -The EU and the Constitution

Blue_Moon2

Editorial

The Referendum is binding – May gets her constitutional position right

Theresa May has announced she is not going to put the triggering of Article 50 to Parliament. Ah the Remainers cry (When I say remainers in this article I am talking those who still refuse to accept the result, and there are more of them than you may think), the vote was about Parliamentary democracy and now you don’t want parliament to have a say. This is a lazy position as we actually are not a Parliamentary Democracy, but a Constitutional Monarchy. Our Democracy has many levels, but ultimately it leaves parliament sovereign over law but not the Constitution. These are matters exercised through the crown, devolved to the Prime Minister via the will of the people (Who can remove the crown at any time, although this is highly unlikely in my lifetime). When we voted to Leave the EU it was to defend all aspects of our Democracy, both in terms of law and the Constitution. Remainers attempts to pick and choose misunderstands this completely.

In Britain unlike America and many other nations, our constitution is not written and evolves via historical precedent. Because it is not written Remainers argue the Referendum is not binding, this is an abuse of the fact the Constitution is not written because they don’t like the outcome. it is looking for excuses for why they lost and a blatant attempt to reverse the outcome.Some like Tottenham MP David Lammy try and argue the tight nature of the vote also renders it invalid. again this ignores Constitutional precedent. The Welsh Assembly went through on a 50.3% yes vote, the Assembly went through and still very much exists today. Any serious analysis of how that vote leads to the evolution of Constitutional precedent renders Lammy’s argument complete nonsense.

Only once has a majority vote in a Referendum been ignored. This was the Scottish Parliament vote in 1979 where a majority voted for it but a turnout clause put into the bill meant it did not go ahead. The failure to enact this instruction has led to a sequence of events where Scottish Independence nearly happened, and may yet happen in the future. The Tories insistance on using that clause led to Tory meltdown in Scotland, leaving the SNP to oppose Labour. When the tide went out for Labour, the SNP took over, are now a third term Government in Holyrood and can command 45% for Scottish Independence. The consequences of not making good on a majority Constitutional instruction is a very dangerous thing for those concerned, with hugely unpredictable results.

Those events should serve as warning for those in the Conservative Party who may want to reverse the Referendum result. Since then lessons have been learnt and the concept of Referenda has evolved. Every Referendum since had been fought on the basis a simple majority wins, and the Constitutional instruction has been heard and acted upon, including in the very narrow Welsh scenario. Therefore if rules on a Referendum were part of a written constitution, would it be binding? Yes. Thus is a Referendum binding? Yes. Even in 1979 the actions taken were in line as everyone voting knew the turnout filter was there in advance.The result under the rules set is binding and any other position is an abuse of the unwritten Constitution. To say it isn’t tears up the unwritten Constitution and worse, hands Parliament sovereignty over the Constitution and takes it away from the Crown and ultimately the people. Therefore no, parliament has no right to a say in this matter, the instruction from the people must be implemented. And no, supporting the principal of parliamentary democracy for matters of law but not for matters of the constitution is not a contradiction. Theresa May’s call that it is a matter for Royal Prerogative and should not be put to parliament, is absolutely correct.

Moon Of Liberty Editorial Comment

Blue_Moon2

Editorial

Team GB at the Olympics is the best health strategy

The Olympics is not yet finished, but it is already Britain’s most successful away games, and there is still an outside chance we could match the 29 gold medals won at London. The success coincides with the unveiling of the Government’s ‘Obesity strategy.’ The fact we have such a thing is testament to the very worst of our NHS and the idea the State should be responsible for everything to do with health in this country.The Government have not giving the health groups everything they wanted especially on their advertising demands and should be commended for not capitulating everything. The reality is the Olympics are part of the best health strategy, encouraging more to play sport and those who become good, will voluntarily take on board other issues like diet, discipline and hard work in order to become better. Sport is a better health strategy than a sugar tax or advertising restrictions, encouraging self responsibility. So congratulations to those winning medals, who are doing more for the health of Britain than Government and the noisy, ghastly nanny state health crowd ever will.

The National Lottery achieves

In 1997 John Major’s Government with Virginia Bottomley as Culture, Media & Sport Secretary set up the National Lottery. This was in the aftermath of the 1996 Atlanta Olympics where, had it not been for the brilliance of Steve Redgrave and Matthew Pinsent. Britain would have come home with zero gold medals. A large part of the lottery was to ensure this never happened again. Four Olympics later we have had four of our most successful Olympics since the early days in the early 1900’s. The National Lottery through Sport UK has delivered, yes of course the Athletes have too but those politicians who, at that time on the point of losing power, had the vision to set up something for the long term, should be applauded too.

Team EU?

A Pro European Union group have created their own medal table showing ‘Team EU’ top of the medal table by adding up the medals won by EU countries, including Britain (We are, sadly, still a member right now.) This has raised the temperature of some on the Leave side of the argument. The right response is to laugh, it is trivial, and we all know many Pro-EU types don’t have much of a sense of humour. The sinister side pf this also shows however they are serious about forcing the EU together as one as the Leave side argued throughout the Referendum which the Remain side, wrongly, dismissed.. More proof we were 100% right to vote to leave this dangerous entity.